Phuket sells sun, sea and sand," said then-Interior
Minister Purachai Piumsombun on 12 January 2002. 'We want good tourists who
enjoy nature and beautiful scenery. We don't want drunkards." These comments
set the tone for the government's battle against the nightlife industry,
which has since surged ahead with full force across Thailand.
The Phuket entertainment industry, concentrated in Patong,
has struggled to keep the sanuk (fun) factor high over the past three
years, having faced a number of crises, including the 9/11 attack, SARS, war
in Iraq and the bombing in Bali. At the same time world events threaten to
keep tourists away and purse strings tight, a home-grown attack on the
entertainment industry has been waged since late 2000, starting with raids
on nightlife venues operating after 2am.
The raids began in the run-up to the national election
and continued through 2001 after Minister Purachai announced the
government's "Better Social Order" policy, the stated aim of which was to
"foster family values and promote law and order" across the country. The
enforcement of 2am closing times for nightspots, raids on bars for underage
patrons, and on-the-spot checks for illegal drugs were part of a larger
strategy to clean up the country's vices.
The latest move came late last year when it was suddenly
announced that, under pending legislation, all nightlife venues across the
country would soon be forced to close at midnight. Pattanapong Akevanich,
chairman of the Phuket Tourist Association, predicted at the time that
Phuket would suffer an estimated loss of up to 20 billion baht in tourist
revenue as a result of the new measures. Others in the Phuket entertainment
industry voiced concern that the midnight closures would keep tourists away
and thousands of jobs would be lost, while doing nothing to protect young
people from drugs and other vices. Hundreds of entertainment workers staged
protests in Patong and petitioned the government to reconsider.
Facing growing protests in Bangkok, Phuket and other
regions, the government retreated and came up with a new plan that
established entertainment zones and set closing times for different types of
venues.
Under the new plan, passed by the Cabinet in early March,
all establishments licensed before January 13 must close at 1am. Exceptions
include nightclubs and bars, which may remain open until 2am, and lounges,
restaurants and massage parlours, which will have to close at midnight. The
regulations are not much different than previous laws requiring pubs,
discos, cafes and restaurants with live bands to close at 1am.
The regulations also give Phuket two entertainment zones,
both of them in tourist areas: Bangla Road and vicinity in Patong, and Taina
Road in Kata. These are the only areas where licenses for new entertainment
venues will be granted in the future.
Poonsuk "Daeng" Sanchan, owner of the 12-year-old Boat
Bar in Patong, says that the enforcement of the 2am regulation and the
confusion over new laws have had a negative effect on his and other
entertainment businesses. He points out that the laws have had no effect on
changing the habits of people going out. Most people still arrive at bars
between 11pm and midnight, he says, giving bars only a few hours to earn an
income.
Gerard Tan, general manager of Banthai Beach Resort, in
the heart of Patong, agrees: "Tourists have a lot of money in their pocket,
but no place to spend it [after 2am], except in the 7-Eleven. This is a
tourist island — bars should be allowed to stay open until at least 4am. The
people coming to Patong are nocturnal and enjoy going out at night."
Khun Daeng says that nightlife is not the only attraction
of Phuket, but that it has played an important role in convincing people to
stay longer, spend more and come back again. "People like to go out and they
need many options," he says. Extending the operating hours of venues
catering to tourists to 3-4am would boost the industry, while proper zoning
would fulfill the government's aim to keep youngsters away from trouble.
"Now that we have our new licenses," says Daeng, "let's see whether we will
get zoning or not."
A member of the ruling Thai Rak Thai Party suggested the
same in a recent newspaper report. Pramon Khanakasem, a Bangkok MP, said
Singapore's tourism industry suffered when it tried to force venues to close
at midnight. Later, the island-state moved the closing time to 4am, which
led to more revenue growth. He noted that there were no problems with the
late-night venues because "the Singaporean government earnestly observes
zoning".
The "earnestness" of local law enforcement officials has
been a point of contention for many industry players. While some venues are
subject to high-profile raids and checks, others stay open till dawn. Khun
Daeng says that, at 2am, tourists are left with no place go except venues
that circumvent the law. "But if they go to an illegal place, it's not safe
for them."
A recent poll of 1,009 tourists conducted by eight major
resorts in Patong found that just 3 percent were dissatisfied with the
closing hours of discos and bars, while 61 percent considered the operating
hours "excellent" or "very good". What was not clear, however, was whether
the tourists polled knew that venues are required by law to shut town at 1am
or 2am. A number of tourists interviewed for this story said they were not
aware of laws on closing times, and that they easily found places that were
open until 4-5am.
Whether the bars shut down at midnight, 2am or 5am, the
crux of the debate is about how the country wants to define itself. Under
the Thaksin government, Thailand is actively trying to shed its image as a
destination for tawdry and wild nightlife. In the official marketing
literature promoting Phuket's nightlife entertainment, for example, the
family-friendly Phuket FantaSea show is emphasized, while places with names
like "Fantasy A-Go-Go" are notably absent.